What are the core elements of a secular approach to the dharma?

July 11, 2022


How do we explain to those who are unfamiliar with secular Buddhism what this approach is in a brief, concise form? Stephen Batchelor offered his formulation in ‘Buddhism in a Nutshell‘, part of a talk he gave at an interfaith series in March 2011.

Eleven year later, at a 25 May 2022 online meeting of leaders and facilitators of secular Buddhist groups, organizations, and sanghas, we discussed how to best define or describe a secular approach to the dharma. The following includes some of the perspectives presented at the meeting or submitted afterwards. The perspectives are presented alphabetically, by first name.

Bernat Font

If a secular dharma is one which embraces and values the impermanent and conditioned world rather than seek to transcend it, then, for coherence, it must reject the doctrine that Anything Conditioned and Impermanent is Dukkha (ACID). This doctrine also takes the form of the ‘three meanings of dukkha’, which applies an everyday word for pain and suffering (duḥkha/dukkha) to all experiences. ACID is in fact a practical means to induce renunciation.

In the basic reasoning ‘anicca > dukkha > anattā’, the first item is an observable universal fact, while the other two are conclusions traditional Buddhism draws from it – crucially, the second is a renunciant value judgment. Impermanence is just the alternation of good and bad. To emphasize the bad, and even to absolutize it, is a negative assessment of the situation that aligns with a renunciant or world-denying orientation.

Therefore, a secular dharma must reject ACID or consciously reinterpret it. What we value in it, like certain psychological effects, its potential to foster acceptance or stimulate existential reflection, can still be achieved by other means, without metaphysical claims of inherent unsatisfactoriness.

John Danvers, Exeter Meditation Circle

secular: from the Latin, ‘saeculum’ – of this age, time, world

–  that is, a Buddhism of this time and place, making sense and working within our culture, meeting our everyday needs and aspirations, open to the same kinds of reasonable questioning and rational enquiry we would apply to any other activity – ‘secular’ or ‘agnostic’ Buddhist practice is not in any way opposed to formal religious institutions and traditions, but a complement to them.

The term, ‘secular Buddhism’ is not intended to refer to a particular category of Buddhism, let alone a new school or sect. In our understanding, the term refers to an informal process – an exploratory movement of individuals and groups who are developing forms of Buddhist practice that meet the needs and demands of people living in twenty-first century cultures across the globe. Our Buddhist practices are grounded in this life – our daily life with all its ups and downs, shocks and surprises, messiness and mystery. Mindful awareness of our daily experience is the primary method for understanding and coming to terms with life’s ever-changing pleasures and pains.

Participants in the Exeter Meditation Circle come from many different backgrounds, contributing to the Circle in ways that reflect their life-experiences and their experience of different approaches to Buddhism, other religions, philosophies, sciences and arts. We place particular value on personal responsibility and self-reliance, within the context of a deepening understanding of how we are all interconnected and interdependent. In a small way, we are working to create a culture of awakening in which all beings, and the environment in which we live, are valued and cared for.

http://www.meditationcircle.org.uk/secular-buddhism

Lenore Lambert

How do we define a secular approach to the dharma?

A means of practising the Buddha’s wisdom that is true* to the teachings, makes sense in our place and time, addresses contemporary challenges, draws on any source that’s helpful, and is practical.

What are the core elements of secular Buddhism?

  1. A secular reading of the Pali canon as our primary source for ‘what the Buddha taught’
  2. Openness to any source of insight, resources or practices that help us with the four tasks (including but in no way limited to traditional Buddhisms)
  3. Makes sense in this place and time, including in the light of evolving scientific knowledge
  4. No sacred cows – honest and open questioning of anything (including teachings, translations, teachers and their behaviour)
  5. (Related to #3) Practice as practice – honest self-enquiry to ensure that our ‘practice’ (noun) is also part of our practice (verb). That is, we are constantly seeking to maintain self awareness. E.g. Am I ‘selfing’ right now in my reaction to a religious Buddhist? Am I trying to grow my sangha attendee list to show that 'my' sangha is successful? How many books have I sold? Why, as a teacher, was I reluctant to answer that question from a sangha member about my personal practice? Why should the car park at the sangha hall be left for me just because I’m the teacher? You get the drift.

Lorna Edwards

Meeting ELSA in a coffee shop

(please read with a rap-ish beat!)

I met ELSA in a coffee shop
americano, oat mild on the side -
with Steven, Steven with a V !
a member of Cardiff mindfulness teachers group
'Stephen Batchelor', says Steven, 'has created the Four Tasks
- as an alternative to the Four Noble Truths.'
I am curious ...
ELSA

embrace life
let go reactivity
see the ceasing
act ... the eightfold path ...
in no particular order ,,,
perspective
imagination
application
mindfulness
focus
voice
work
survival
and, like mother hen turning and rearranging her eggs with her feet to keep them equally warm, we can attempt to do so with the aspects of the path.

ELSA invites us, join us if you like !

Let us care for planet Earth
see our place in the manner of things
and be less fucking human centric...

Mike Slott

Secular Buddhism is a practical, ethical philosophy which aims to reduce suffering and promote the flourishing of all beings in this life.

Like other perspectives and philosophies with a similar orientation, such as secular humanism, liberatory political theories, modern versions of Stoicism, and certain trends within psychology and neuroscience, secular Buddhism has emerged as a response to the interrelated challenges that we face in our time, our saeculum: growing social divisions; the loss of community and an increasing sense of alienation; widespread economic inequality; and the climate crisis. In responding to these challenges and offering a way forward, secular Buddhism is deeply informed by the contemporary values of democracy, inclusion, mutuality, and pluralism.

Among perspectives and philosophies oriented toward human flourishing, secular Buddhism is distinguished by its particular understanding of the causes of suffering, the remedy for suffering, and the path toward flourishing. Based on certain aspects of the Buddha’s early teachings, secular Buddhists understand suffering as the product, in large part, of our tendency to react unskillfully to life’s vicissitudes and thus cause harm to ourselves and others.

The remedy for suffering resides in engaging in a fourfold task in which individuals strive to limit their tendency toward reactivity and cultivate views, attitudes, and values which promote compassion, mutual solidarity, non-harming, and peace between each other and other beings. In this shift to a less reactive mode of being and a culture marked by compassion and mindfulness, human beings can more fully flourish, that is, develop their potential for creative activity, wisdom, and love.

While secular Buddhism emerged from certain modernist forms of Buddhism, advocates of secular Buddhism are not focused on establishing a new form of Buddhism as an alternative to traditional lineages. Rather, secular Buddhists seek to offer the insights and fruitful practices of the secular dharma as an important component of the broader movement to reduce suffering and promote flourishing in the early 21st century.

Ramsey Margolis

1 – How do we describe a secular approach to the dharma?

A set of ideas that were meant to be practised, individually and communally, a secular approach to the dharma offers a practical philosophy that helps us to develop a culture of awakening.

These ideas underpin how we live our lives and how we respond to our experience, rather than what we believe about how we live our lives.

It is not an identity, but an approach we practise with ethics, with care, and with self-knowledge, reflecting on Gotama’s final words: ‘Things fall apart. Tread the path with care.’

2 – So, what are the core elements of a secular dharma?

At the core of a secular dharma are four tasks. These are:

1 – to fully experience all of life, embracing and understanding suffering

2 – to let go of the habitual reactivity we generally fall into in the face of life’s difficulties

3 – to learn to stop, momentarily and repeatedly, relishing this peace of mind whenever the mind is free of reactivity

4 – to let these experiences inspire us to cultivate the eight aspects of the path, a middle way that, as suggested in the Sutta on The City (SN 12.65), leads to the restoration of a city. These eight aspects are:

  • perspective = ditthi
  • imagination = sankappa
  • application, or perseverance = vayama
  • recollective awareness, or mindfulness = sati
  • focus = samadhi
  • voice = vaca
  • work, livelihood, vocation, or calling = kammanta, and
  • survival = ajiva

Saskia Graf

Secular Buddhism is an experience based, contemporary, pragmatic, process-oriented approach to the Buddha-Dharma.

It does not set itself as absolute. It tries to develop a framework model that respects other points of view and is open to new understandings and perspectives. Its view of the world is not static, but oriented toward continuous, beneficial development and free from metaphysical beliefs.

Secular Buddhism is based on contemporary evolutionary humanistic ethics, not on Buddhist legalistic ethics, meditative practice, and experience-based, process-oriented cultivation of wisdom.

The focus of Secular Buddhism is on our actions in this one and only life, on what is helpful and reduces suffering, taking into account the three marks of existence.

It is a guideline that cultivates a compassionate, caring way of life that creates space for all sentient beings to unfold and flourish in our present world.

Secular Buddhism is not only about how to awaken as an individual, but also about how to cultivate a society, a culture of awakening.

Ted Meissner

Secular Buddhism is an accurate description of moment-by-moment experience in daily life, and a structure to support well-being in this lifetime.

Winton Higgins

Secular Buddhism/dharma contributes to the process of making the dharma and its practice culturally available to people steeped in modern western culture.

The adjective ‘secular’ here refers to the need for any great tradition like Buddhism to address people in the specific times, places and cultures that they inhabit. Secularity contrasts with the tendency of religions to assert timeless metaphysical truths, and the value of timeless rules, practices and rituals, irrespective of historical context.

The dharma does rest on a timeless meta-ethic – the ethic of care – but historical situations must mould how we practise it. For instance, today it must guide us in tackling our current two great crises – global warming and global social injustice. In the Buddha’s time no such responsibilities hung over him or his followers.

So as secular Buddhists we see the Buddha himself not as a religious prophet, but as what the contemporary Greeks called a ‘practical philosopher’, one who staked out a fruitful way to work with fundamental predicaments facing people during the ongoing agricultural revolution. That is, people with a degree of leisure and freedom to make informed life choices, but still intractably subject to birth, ageing, sickness, death, unpleasantness, frustration, and vulnerability. To thrive as human beings, we must work creatively with these elements of the human condition.

We are such people ourselves, so we stand to benefit from applying his dharma – his matrix of interpretive concepts – to parse our life experiences, and to respond intelligently to the predicaments we face, in terms of the cultures we inhabit now.


POST TAGS


COMMENTS

Before submitting a comment, please review the SBN guidelines for contributors and readers’ comments.

3 Replies to “What are the core elements of a secular approach to the dharma?”

Ric Streatfield

What are the core elements of a secular approach to the dharma?
Well, THE core element and greatest gift the Buddha left for the whole of humanity surely has to be his insight he called Dependent co-Arising (DcoA). My background is science and medicine, with an interest in the recent 40 years or so in RH Blyth’s volumes on Zen. So I guess I am lucky in that I have never had a Buddhist teacher because when I found the Paticca samuppada and wrote the Buddha’s rational and logical sequence down as a linear flow chart I immediately thought …..’So this is what all those Zen Masters were pointing to with their oblique, tangential koans’. The Buddha’s own version of DcoA is so clear and relevant in relation to understanding our problems in our present day that I’m astonished, and admittedly annoyed, when so many Buddhists, even Secular Buddhists these days, insist on using the ‘Hindu-ised’ Bhavacakra – Wheel-of-Life version…..But, then again, I guess most had Buddhist Teachers ….and so it goes on.
Ric

Kelly

For me, Buddhism is a secular spirituality committed to helping reduce suffering and promote well-being for all. I firmly commit myself to helping reduce suffering and promote well-being for anyone and everyone regardless of who they are, including animals and ecosystems.

My secular approach to Buddhism is inspired by the teachings of Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, in his books “Ethics for the New Millennium” and “Beyond Religion.” What is ethics? Ethics is my commitment to help reduce suffering and promote well-being for all. What is spirituality? Spirituality is my commitment to cultivate personal qualities that improve my ability to reduce suffering and promote well-being.

I turn to Buddhism to help me uphold my ethical and spiritual commitments. I study the Dharma and apply its teachings to my everyday life. I do my best to uphold 10 Buddhist precepts. I train my mind using Buddhist practices.

Yet, my understanding and practice of Buddhism is not typical. I camp at the edges of Buddhism. I will not grow angry or argue with anyone who claims that I am not a Buddhist. I may indeed be so atypical that, for some people, I fall outside the borders of Buddhism.

Sotapanna

This is an honest question for the group of writers above, as I really don’t understand certain things and hope you would indulge me on this.

You seem to be espousing a certain philosophy of life. That’s fine, nothing wrong with that. But why call it, in any shape or form, Buddhism? What exactly do you think ties your specific beliefs to the dhamma (or dharma, if you will)? Besides sprinkling your descriptions with a few terms from the Buddha’s canon, most if not all of which you probably don’t really understand their true meaning, why call it anything remotely related to Buddhism and aggravate the already confused interpretation of the term? Why not call it “secular mindfulness network” or some other more neutral terms?

In case I am coming across as glib, please consider that there are many, many people out there that are drawn to the Buddha’s teachings (the Dhamma) in order to find “true” escape from the suffering of this life and, even if you do not believe in it, all of samsara. That alone is a monumental milestone in their spiritual development, especially in this day and age where sensual indulgence is immensely pervasive. Yet, for those same people, the next step is fraught with too many choices among countless proliferations of “Buddhism”. It’s like being in a roundabout (those street circles in Europe) with dozens of different streets going off in different directions. And only very few of them will lead to the true goal the Buddha taught. Why add, unnecessarily, to that roundabout yet another road that will lead far, far short of the destination? What good can it do to those who might follow your “teachings” because they don’t know any better? What good can it do to those of you who are teaching or sponsoring this otherwise innocuous philosophy?

If nothing else, perhaps your answers here might raise some authentic introspection for anybody who is reading this. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

' skin='skin1'}}